Often in the mail box I've arrived like chains in San Antonio so please spread the message inherent in the scandal of MPs' earnings and privilege unattainable to the average of the opponent.
I have always hated and nipped in the bud.
Not so much because there was not the truth, and we just read "La Casta" by Sergio Rizzo and Gian Antonio Stella, clearly and accurately documented. But because the
I can not stand in absolute generalizations, and opinions "so much per pound, and superficiality.
For the temptation has always been to respond to the senders of email with questions.
For example: Which congressman or senator would have voted or voted or otherwise represent your area? What did he do? What are the politics that follow? You know what laws he proposed? you wrote the e-mail to express approval or disapproval?
Well, read a book like "Build a Cathedral" by Enrico Letta does just that, to learn ideas and arguments of people who have voted or not never vote.
The title already indicates what is the 'main idea of \u200b\u200bthe book, especially after the start of this crisis to build "cathedrals".
clearly intended not as large churches for religious worship, but how to start or will start to design and build our cathedral, which is called Italy.
read says that to build a cathedral that is something that will remain impressive over time and represent the progress and the level reached by a civilization, it is necessary to the work of many people connected to a single common goal (a goal that perhaps many of those who vi partecipano non vedranno mai completato nella loro vita), ma a cui lavorare con la prospettiva del lungo periodo e della creazione di  valore che duri nel tempo e non solamente al presente.
Come non dargli ragione!  Anche se sinceramente ho la netta impressione che l'  ottica di molte persone sia rivolta non al lungo periodo, e nemmeno al presente, ma allo ieri addirittura.
Il libro sempre ben scritto e leggibile spiega con grande chiarezza quali siano i problemi che frenano questa visione in Italia e analizza gli errori della classe politica di destra e di sinistra, e i gravi pericoli che stiamo correndo.
Un obiezione che può venire leggendo il libro and whether they are good ideas but utopian, not "practical" and very theoretical.
I do not think so, indeed I want to be clear.
Create and expect a nation and a company competitive, flexible, dynamic style is not intellectual, but healthy pure selfishness, a guarantee that tomorrow when I'm older and I have the right to board someone will pay!
finally on the accounts of more privilege, and co-optation.
Italy Addressing the reading and comparison (even if only not to be d 'Agreement and to suggest otherwise) on these ideas is demonstration of intelligence and responsibility. Instead
really believe that the 'so Italy can continue with trends of an aging society, birth or almost zero (1.3%).
Pensions and health care absorbing 87% of the welfare budget leaves no room for example, to allocate resources and to retrain those who lost their jobs, or family policy series.
low economic growth for too many years.
cuts instead of optimization of resources and investment in education and in education, looking as do all nations that make economic growth to raise the level of education (see case there is a close relationship between rising per capita income and education level).
Resources allocated to sectors that will drive future economic growth of zero.
it really be impractical and unrealistic. Although it is convenient, though it was well until yesterday and we do not like change.
why one should read books like this and then talk about it, maybe not to be d 'Agreement and propose another, but it' s important not to do the usual "bar talk", but read, learn , write to your political reference. Even this would
a good way to begin to change in society, in the words read to build cathedrals.
0 comments:
Post a Comment